Examining the Constitutionality of Gag Orders
Gag orders, intended to safeguard trial integrity, often clash with First Amendment rights. While they aim to prevent bias, critics argue they stifle transparency and impede defendants’ ability to defend themselves. The constitutionality of these orders, as seen in landmark cases, requires a delicate balance between free speech and fair trials. The ongoing debate highlights the complexities in upholding constitutional principles in modern legal contexts.
