The Impact of Counting Non-Citizens on American Elections

In the complex landscape of American politics, every census count holds significant weight, not just for demographic analysis but also for the fundamental process of redistricting. However, the issue of whether to count non-citizens in the census has become a contentious debate, particularly as it relates to its potential impact on elections. In this blog, we will explore how counting every person in America, including non-citizens, could potentially skew the election process for Democrats due to redistricting.

 Understanding the Census and Redistricting

The decennial census serves as the cornerstone for redrawing congressional and state legislative districts, a process known as redistricting. The principle behind redistricting is to ensure equal representation by adjusting district boundaries based on changes in population. Each district should ideally represent a comparable number of people to uphold the principle of “one person, one vote.”

 The Debate Over Counting Non-Citizens

At the heart of the debate lies the question: should non-citizens be included in the census count? Advocates argue that counting non-citizens is essential for obtaining an accurate representation of the population, as they contribute to communities and economies. However, opponents argue that including non-citizens in the count could potentially dilute the voting power of citizens and lead to unfair political representation.  This goal has been achieved by the Democrats.

 Impact on Redistricting

The inclusion of non-citizens in the census count directly affects the allocation of congressional seats and electoral votes, as well as the redrawing of legislative districts. In areas with large immigrant populations, counting non-citizens could lead to the creation of districts with fewer eligible voters, effectively diminishing the voting power of citizens in those areas.  There are multiple conservative states that are losing seats to the liberal states because of the influx of illegal immigration.

 The Partisan Divide

The partisan implications of counting non-citizens are significant. Historically, areas with high immigrant populations tend to lean Democratic. Therefore, including non-citizens in the census count could potentially benefit Democrats by increasing their representation in Congress and state legislatures. 

 Gerrymandering Concerns

Gerrymandering, the manipulation of district boundaries to favor one political party over another, further exacerbates the issue. The inclusion of non-citizens in the census count provides an opportunity for partisan gerrymandering, as it allows for the creation of districts designed to consolidate Democratic-leaning populations, thereby giving Democrats an advantage in elections. 

 Conclusion

The question of whether to count non-citizens in the census is not merely a matter of demographic accuracy but also has significant political ramifications, particularly in the context of redistricting. While including non-citizens ensures a more comprehensive representation of the population, it also opens the door to potential electoral manipulation and partisan advantage.   As redistricting changes voting districts and allows more districts in liberal areas, it subtracts from the conservative districts in conservative states. As the debate continues, it is essential to consider the broader implications for democracy and fair representation in the electoral process.  It is clear to me that if this behavior is not stopped we will become a one-party nation which is one step closer to a socialist society. What do you think? Should this behavior be stopped? Write your congress-person and senators to ask them to support legislation allowing only U.S. citizens to be counted for the purpose of voting districts.